Benjamin H Brewster once said "lawyer starts life giving $ 500 worth of law for $ 5 and ends giving $ 5 worth for $ 500."
It is interesting that would FW Taylor father of scientific management have mentioned this condition as a displacement of labor, tasks and rewards system. A closer look would have a few similarities between what is known as general principles of scientific management and for outsourcing, since both concepts promote labor (specialization), de-skilling of workers and the dehumanization of the workplace, which are important for process expertise in business.
 Most of us know that the benefits of outsourcing is commonly known in the information age today, whether it be to exploit locational advantages, to get quality, promote innovation, access to new markets and so on. Companies which we recognize in the process of multiplying the value of shareholder wealth, are some ways demonize the philosophy of "make all-in-the-by-self ', in step targeted growth engines. Partnerships are sought out coasts, new locations have been examined, tested business models and talents are allowed to create a significant impact on endearing value creation for stakeholders.
Subject of outsourcing is not new for us and for India India 
Legal process outsourcing (famously known as the LPO) is today still a high tide in the raging sea of outsourcing, which means enough power to eliminate the fundamental nature of law as a practice and delivery of legal services worldwide. Customer needs and expectations of quantum quality of service seem to have diametrically stretched business processes and thus rewrite new impact in client relationship management. Those who witness these underlying movements will verify that the law as a practice tilts in its content, scope and criticality especially when the legal and non legal work in the guise of cost, quality and other strategic benefits of shipping out to different destinations. On the other hand, is the visible fear of losing control of the process, shrinking job profile and risking the quality of service concerns that frustrate lawyers and law firms in the U.S.  and Britain  from outsourcing work to countries like India 
Recognizing these requirements Bar Association, for example, in Florida , Los  Angeles County , New York , North Carolina  and San Diego  County 
The American Bar Association (popularly known as ABA 
The landmark opinion issued last year by the Ethics Committee of the ABA and concepts such as competence, competent representation, the layman, client confidentiality, client consent, monitoring of non-lawyers, to avoid aiding non-lawyers in the unauthorized practice of law, commodity-work and so far, which have experienced different interpretations are discussed under a number of ideas proposed by the ABA.
The following pairs are some of the details summarized as thus serve as building blocks in the process of outsourcing legal work:
1. Liability: Lawyer may outsource legal or not legal advice, provided that the lawyer is ultimately responsible for providing competent legal services to the client, since lawyers also involves various parties (including both non-lawyers) in servicing clients 
2. Diligence: Ensuring the conduct of the service is compatible with professional obligations, especially for a remote offshore location. Key considerations are the reference checking / background investigations of lawyer or non-lawyer service providers / retailers, and if necessary, conduct the interview, educational background veterinarian visits, etc. 
3. Client Consent: Written confidentiality advised, however, depending on the level of supervision contemplated by the outsourcing lawyer to obtain informed client consent before engaging outside (offshore and onshore) assistance may be required 
4. Fees: Reasonability of fees is necessary. Permission to proceed to the customer the costs of using services including a reasonable allocation of associated overhead costs, without mark-up in some ways 
5. Gender: distinguish onshore outsourcing and offshore outsourcing, with the exception of the care and conducted background checks 
6. Offshore Regulatory Systems: the comparability of legal education in the U.S. 
7. Practice Law: Each local Bar Association opinions addresses this issue and concludes that outsourcing of legal services, either offshore or onshore, is not an unauthorized practice of law since the ABA Ethics Committee noted that it has no authority to express an opinion on whether a particular service provider is to participate in the unauthorized practice of law 
8. Endorsement: Outsourcing is good for health of the profession itself
9. Catalysts: ABA is necessarily involved setting up clear guidelines are enormously helped make lawyers and attorneys in the U.S. to pursue outsourcing to significant benefits 
All these actions and considerations seem to create paradigm shifts in the business landscape legal process outsourcing. The larger question to be answered is whether outsourcing means of a professional lawyer in the U.S. 
Notes and references
 1. elaw Forum estimates the total cost of litigation to be $ 210b corresponding to one third of the after tax of Fortune 500 companies - The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, Feb 08 
2. Currently only 3% of law firms in the U.S.  and UK  outsource their back-office work to India 
3. India 
4. The industry employed around 7,500 people in the legal off shoring space in India 
5. Estimates that the number of jobs outsourced legal services sector would grow to 35,000 in 2010 and up to 79,000 in 2015 - Forrester Research 
6. ABA 
7. Florida Ethics Op. 07-2; N. C State Bar, Formal Ethics Op.12, Calif. State Bar Assoc. Formal Op. 1994-138
8. Colorado Bar Assoc. Ethics Op. 1712 (same); IL adv. Up. 98-02
9. NEW C of Professional Responsibility (Code) - DR-1-104, DR3-102, DR4-101, DR5-105 & 107, DR-6-101, EC2-22, 6-EC3, EC4-2, EC4-5

 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment