Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Resolution, Pixels and Megapixels in Digital Photography

Even in the most technical environments, we may stumble across several confusions between dimension and the resolution of the digital photography images. If someone tells you that they want a printed image at 300 dpi, you will not be able to understand what they want, but unfortunately they do not understand either why you can not operate them. Because people are so accustomed to normal photos, watch a digital time do not tell them much about its dimensions. classic images has two defining dimensions, so give the two will say anything to be said about this picture. In digital photography, all three variables are needed to define a photo, length, width and density. 

The provenience of the word pixel comes from "picture element", for short, Pixel, and those deemed to be the smallest divisions of a digital photographic image. As inches are the basic units of concrete images, pixels will be those that best defines digital photos. To say a picture is 300 x 150 pixels gives an idea of its digital form. Unfortunately, the pixel dimensions are not easy to spot real mountain terrain level so we have to use different measuring systems that resolution. 

Dissolution means the density of pixels per inch. This is what the previously mentioned 300 dpi means that the solution of a given digital image. So once we know this density, we can associate it with the dimensions in pixels, and we can find out the actual dimensions of that image if we ever wanted to print it. 

In the first days of digital photography, was captors that produces instant digital image in the camera's memory a real problem. That is why all find mega pixel so important. Today when we go to a digital camera shop, we will see this number written big and bold as they are the only ones that count. 

People have a tendency to only look at this big and bold number when buying a camera, but it is not the only measure of quality. Lentils are very important and so is the storage capacity of the device and battery life. Snapfish

No comments: